Conspit CPP EVO 3
$900
Logitech G923
$319
Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–100 scale)
Why is Conspit CPP EVO 3 better than Logitech G923?
Has 180.00 KG more of force
Has better adjustability
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Conspit CPP EVO 3 vs Logitech G923
Feature | Conspit CPP EVO 3 | Logitech G923 |
|---|---|---|
900 $ BEST | 319 $ | |
N/A | 2.3 Nm | |
N/A | 0 Bit | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | Belt Drive | |
200 KG BEST | 20 KG | |
N/A | Potentiometer BEST | |
Aluminum | Plastic | |
7 BEST | 3 | |
N/A | 280 mm | |
N/A | 23 | |
N/A | Plastic BEST | |
N/A | Leather BEST | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
More Details | View on Simufy | View on Logitech G |
Have you used the Conspit CPP EVO 3 before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the Logitech G923 before?
Help the community by answering
What does the community think about Conspit CPP EVO 3 and Logitech G923?
Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world simracing setups.
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Conspit CPP EVO 3 and Logitech G923 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Pedal Force Performance
This chart compares the pedal force required by sim racing pedals against the level of realism they provide in driving feel for different car types.
simracingcompare.com
Pedal Force vs Realism Feeling
Minimal
Light
Moderate
Strong
Exceptional
The curve shows how pedal force relates to the perceived realism of the pedal’s response. Different race types have varying expected maximum pedal forces, marked by the red reference line, reflecting the typical pedal feel needed for that category.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Looking for alternatives to Conspit CPP EVO 3?
Check out the Top 5 alternatives to Conspit CPP EVO 3
Build Your Perfect Sim Racing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
