Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–10 scale)
Why is Conspit 290 GP better than CAMMUS C12 ?
Has 2 more funky switches
Has 1 more rotary encoders
Has 4 more thumb encoders
Has 2 more clutch paddles
Has 4.3" screen
Technical Specifications
Compare features between CAMMUS C12 vs Conspit 290 GP
Feature | CAMMUS C12 | Conspit 290 GP |
|---|---|---|
499 $ | 732 $ BEST | |
4.8 kg BEST | 1.4 kg | |
12 Nm | N/A | |
18 Bit | N/A | |
Aluminum | N/A | |
Direct Drive | N/A | |
300 mm BEST | 290 mm | |
14 BEST | 12 | |
Carbon Fiber | Carbon Fiber | |
Leather BEST | Rubber | |
N/A | 4.3 " | |
2 | 2 | |
N/A | 2 | |
N/A | 2 | |
2 | N/A | |
2 | 3 BEST | |
N/A | 4 | |
More Details | View on Cammus Racing | View on Simufy |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between CAMMUS C12 and Conspit 290 GP in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Build Your PerfectSimracing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
Ready to Build?
Select products to compare and get personalized setup recommendations
Start Building Now
