Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–10 scale)
Why is Conspit 290 GP better than PXN W CS R2 ?
Has 2 more funky switches
Has 1 more rotary encoders
Has 4 more thumb encoders
Has 2 more clutch paddles
Has 4.3" screen
Has better face materials
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Conspit 290 GP vs PXN W CS R2
Feature | Conspit 290 GP | PXN W CS R2 |
---|---|---|
732 $ BEST | 279 $ | |
1.4 kg | N/A | |
290 mm | 330 mm BEST | |
12 | 12 | |
Carbon Fiber BEST | Aluminum | |
Rubber | Leather BEST | |
4.3 " | N/A | |
2 | 2 | |
2 | N/A | |
2 | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
3 BEST | 2 | |
4 | N/A | |
More Details | View on Simufy | View on PXN |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Conspit 290 GP and PXN W CS R2 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Build Your PerfectSimracing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
Ready to Build?
Select products to compare and get personalized setup recommendations
Start Building Now