Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–10 scale)
Why is Conspit CPP EVO 3 better than Simagic P2000 ?
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Conspit CPP EVO 3 vs Simagic P2000
Feature | Conspit CPP EVO 3 | Simagic P2000 |
|---|---|---|
900 $ BEST | 679 $ | |
N/A | 6.1 kg | |
200 KG | 200 KG | |
N/A | Load Cell BEST | |
Aluminum | Aluminum | |
7 | 7.5 BEST | |
More Details | View on Simufy | View on Simufy |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Conspit CPP EVO 3 and Simagic P2000 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Pedal Force Performance
This chart compares the pedal force required by sim racing pedals against the level of realism they provide in driving feel for different car types.
simracingcompare.com
Pedal Force vs Realism Feeling
Minimal
Light
Moderate
Strong
Exceptional
The curve shows how pedal force relates to the perceived realism of the pedal’s response. Different race types have varying expected maximum pedal forces, marked by the red reference line, reflecting the typical pedal feel needed for that category.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Build Your PerfectSimracing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
Ready to Build?
Select products to compare and get personalized setup recommendations
Start Building Now
