Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–10 scale)
Why is Simagic Alpha Evo 18Nm better than CAMMUS C12 ?
Has 6.00 nm more of strength
Has better encoder resolution
Technical Specifications
Compare features between CAMMUS C12 vs Simagic Alpha Evo 18Nm
Feature | CAMMUS C12 | Simagic Alpha Evo 18Nm |
|---|---|---|
499 $ | 699 $ BEST | |
4.8 kg | N/A | |
12 Nm | 18 Nm BEST | |
18 Bit | 21 Bit BEST | |
Aluminum | Metal | |
Direct Drive | Direct Drive | |
300 mm | N/A | |
14 | N/A | |
Carbon Fiber BEST | N/A | |
Leather BEST | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
2 | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
2 | N/A | |
2 | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
More Details | View on Cammus Racing | View on Simufy |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between CAMMUS C12 and Simagic Alpha Evo 18Nm in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Wheel Base Torque Performance
This chart compares wheel base torque output and its effect on force feedback realism based on the selected race type.
simracingcompare.com
Torque vs Feeling
Minimal
Light
Moderate
Strong
Exceptional
The curve adapts based on the race type, showing how torque relates to perceived performance feeling. The expected max torque is shown as a reference.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Build Your PerfectSimracing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
Ready to Build?
Select products to compare and get personalized setup recommendations
Start Building Now
