CAMMUS C5
$242
Simagic GT Neo
$269
Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–100 scale)
Why is Simagic GT Neo better than CAMMUS C5?
Has 1.00 more rotary encoders
Has better grip materials
Technical Specifications
Compare features between CAMMUS C5 vs Simagic GT Neo
Feature | CAMMUS C5 | Simagic GT Neo |
|---|---|---|
242 $ | 269 $ BEST | |
N/A | 1100 kg | |
5 Nm | N/A | |
15 Bit | N/A | |
Aluminum | N/A | |
Direct Drive | N/A | |
280 mm | 300 mm BEST | |
20 BEST | 10 | |
Carbon Fiber | Carbon Fiber | |
Leather | Alcantara BEST | |
N/A | N/A | |
2 | 2 | |
N/A | 2 | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
3 | 4 BEST | |
N/A | N/A | |
More Details | View on Cammus Racing | View on Simufy |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between CAMMUS C5 and Simagic GT Neo in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Build Your PerfectSim Racing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
