Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–10 scale)
Why is Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R better than CAMMUS C5 ?
Has 5 more buttons
Has 1 more rotary encoders
Technical Specifications
Compare features between CAMMUS C5 vs Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R
Feature | CAMMUS C5 | Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R |
|---|---|---|
249 $ | 350 $ BEST | |
N/A | 1.63 kg | |
5 Nm | N/A | |
15 Bit | N/A | |
Aluminum | N/A | |
Direct Drive | N/A | |
280 mm | 320 mm BEST | |
20 | 25 BEST | |
Carbon Fiber BEST | Aluminum | |
Leather BEST | Rubber | |
N/A | N/A | |
2 | 2 | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
3 | 4 BEST | |
N/A | N/A | |
More Details | View on Cammus Racing | View on Thrustmaster EU |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between CAMMUS C5 and Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Build Your PerfectSimracing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
Ready to Build?
Select products to compare and get personalized setup recommendations
Start Building NowPopular Comparisons
Compare CAMMUS C5 or Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R with other top sim racing wheels, wheelbase from brands such as Cammus, Thrustmaster and more.
