Conspit 290 GP
$732
Simagic FX Pro
$899
Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–100 scale)
Why is Simagic FX Pro better than Conspit 290 GP?
Has 6.00 more rotary encoders
Has better grip materials
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Conspit 290 GP vs Simagic FX Pro
Feature | Conspit 290 GP | Simagic FX Pro |
|---|---|---|
732 $ | 899 $ BEST | |
1.4 kg | 17 kg BEST | |
290 mm | 290 mm | |
12 | 12 | |
Carbon Fiber | Carbon Fiber | |
Rubber | Alcantara BEST | |
4.3 " | 4.3 " | |
2 | 2 | |
2 | 2 | |
2 BEST | 1 | |
N/A | N/A | |
3 | 9 BEST | |
4 | N/A | |
More Details | View on Simufy | View on Simufy |
Have you used the Conspit 290 GP before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the Simagic FX Pro before?
Help the community by answering
What does the community think about Conspit 290 GP and Simagic FX Pro?
Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world simracing setups.
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Conspit 290 GP and Simagic FX Pro in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Looking for alternatives to Conspit 290 GP?
Check out the Top 5 alternatives to Conspit 290 GP
Build Your Perfect Sim Racing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
