Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–10 scale)
Why is Conspit 290 GP better than Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R ?
Has 2 more funky switches
Has 4 more thumb encoders
Has 2 more clutch paddles
Has 4.3" screen
Has better face materials
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Conspit 290 GP vs Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R
Feature | Conspit 290 GP | Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R |
|---|---|---|
732 $ BEST | 350 $ | |
1.4 kg | 1.63 kg BEST | |
290 mm | 320 mm BEST | |
12 | 25 BEST | |
Carbon Fiber BEST | Aluminum | |
Rubber | Rubber | |
4.3 " | N/A | |
2 | 2 | |
2 | N/A | |
2 | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
3 | 4 BEST | |
4 | N/A | |
More Details | View on Simufy | View on Thrustmaster EU |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Conspit 290 GP and Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Build Your PerfectSimracing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
Ready to Build?
Select products to compare and get personalized setup recommendations
Start Building NowPopular Comparisons
Compare Conspit 290 GP or Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R with other top sim racing wheels from brands such as Conspit, Thrustmaster and more.
