Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–10 scale)
Why is CUBE F-CORE FORMULA better than Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R ?
Has 2 more thumb encoders
Has 2 more clutch paddles
Has better face materials
Has better grip materials
Technical Specifications
Compare features between CUBE F-CORE FORMULA vs Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R
Feature | CUBE F-CORE FORMULA | Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R |
|---|---|---|
745 $ BEST | 350 $ | |
0.85 kg | 1.63 kg BEST | |
290 mm | 320 mm BEST | |
12 | 25 BEST | |
Carbon Fiber BEST | Aluminum | |
Alcantara BEST | Rubber | |
N/A | N/A | |
2 | 2 | |
2 | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
2 | 4 BEST | |
2 | N/A | |
More Details | View on Trakracer EU | View on Thrustmaster EU |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between CUBE F-CORE FORMULA and Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Build Your PerfectSimracing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
Ready to Build?
Select products to compare and get personalized setup recommendations
Start Building NowPopular Comparisons
Compare CUBE F-CORE FORMULA or Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R with other top sim racing wheels from brands such as Cube Controls, Thrustmaster and more.
