
PXN W CS R2
$279

Simagic GT Neo
$269
Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–100 scale)
Why is Simagic GT Neo better than PXN W CS R2?
Has 2.00 more rotary encoders
Has better face materials
Has better grip materials
Technical Specifications
Compare features between PXN W CS R2 vs Simagic GT Neo
| Feature | PXN W CS R2 | Simagic GT Neo | 
|---|---|---|
| 279 $ BEST | 269 $ | |
| N/A | 1100 kg | |
| 330 mm BEST | 300 mm | |
| 12 BEST | 10 | |
| Aluminum | Carbon Fiber BEST | |
| Leather | Alcantara BEST | |
| N/A | N/A | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| N/A | 2 | |
| N/A | N/A | |
| N/A | N/A | |
| 2 | 4 BEST | |
| N/A | N/A | |
| More Details | View on PXN | View on Simufy | 
Visual Comparison
See the differences between PXN W CS R2 and Simagic GT Neo in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Build Your PerfectSim Racing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.









