Simagic GT Neo
$269
VRS R295
$349
Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–100 scale)
Why is Simagic GT Neo better than VRS R295?
Has 1.00 more rotary encoders
Has better face materials
Has better grip materials
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Simagic GT Neo vs VRS R295
Feature | Simagic GT Neo | VRS R295 |
|---|---|---|
269 $ | 349 $ BEST | |
1100 kg | N/A | |
300 mm BEST | 295 mm | |
10 | 10 | |
Carbon Fiber BEST | Aluminum | |
Alcantara BEST | Rubber | |
N/A | N/A | |
2 | 2 | |
2 | 2 | |
N/A | 2 | |
N/A | N/A | |
4 BEST | 3 | |
N/A | 4 | |
More Details | View on Simufy | View on Simufy |
Have you used the Simagic GT Neo before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the VRS R295 before?
Help the community by answering
What does the community think about Simagic GT Neo and VRS R295?
Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world simracing setups.
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Simagic GT Neo and VRS R295 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Looking for alternatives to Simagic GT Neo?
Check out the Top 5 alternatives to Simagic GT Neo
Build Your Perfect Sim Racing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
