Simagic FX
$629
Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R
$350
Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–100 scale)
Why is Simagic FX better than Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R?
Has 3.00 more rotary encoders
Has better face materials
Has better grip materials
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Simagic FX vs Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R
Feature | Simagic FX | Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R |
|---|---|---|
629 $ BEST | 350 $ | |
1.5 kg | 1.63 kg BEST | |
290 mm | 320 mm BEST | |
12 | 25 BEST | |
Carbon Fiber BEST | Aluminum | |
Alcantara BEST | Rubber | |
N/A | N/A | |
2 | 2 | |
2 | N/A | |
1 | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
7 BEST | 4 | |
N/A | N/A | |
More Details | View on Simufy | View on Thrustmaster EU |
Have you used the Simagic FX before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R before?
Help the community by answering
What does the community think about Simagic FX and Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R?
Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world simracing setups.
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Simagic FX and Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Looking for alternatives to Simagic FX?
Check out the Top 5 alternatives to Simagic FX
Build Your Perfect Sim Racing Setup
Compare wheels, wheelbases, pedals, rigs and more with our setup builder.
Popular Comparisons
Compare Simagic FX or Thrustmaster Evo Racing 32R with other top sim racing wheels from brands such as Simagic, Thrustmaster and more.
